No Bust Blackjack Strategy: Does it Work?
What is your opinion of the continuous shuffle machines now being used at the blackjack tables in Las Vegas?
Do these machines give the house more of and edge even when a person is using basic strategy?
For those who don't understand what you're asking, there are new machines that take the blackjack discards and place them randomly back in the deck after each hand.
If you are using basic strategy, then the shufflers actually lower the house edge slightly, due to the omission of the cut card effect.
It is my understanding that they do provide an honest random shuffle.
However, the shuffling machine allows the dealer to waste less time shuffling and spend more time dealing.
This means you will spend more time playing, and thus more hands for the house edge to grind you down.
For more information on the mathematical effect of continuous shufflers, please see my.
When playing online blackjack, how do you tell when the deck is shuffled?
I play Microgaming casinos which you report as using 1 deckbut I do not know if each time I play if it is a new deck, and there are no signs of knowing when the deck is shuffled.
Most online casinos shuffle after every hand.
Others shuffle at random times but do not indicate exactly when to the player.
I have noticed Microgaming casinos flash the word "shuffling" about one hand in four.
However, if you track the cards between these announcements you will sometimes see the same card twice, which is impossible in a single-deck game, assuming you believe them about when they shuffle.
As far as I know, they actually shuffle after every hand, but for reasons I do not understand, only indicate a shuffle occasionally.
If I remember correctly, Cryptologic casinos do indeed indicate when they are shuffling their eight-deck shoe.
What do you know about the randomization process that online casinos use to simulate shuffling?
How closely does it approximate the actual manual shuffling of cards in a casino?
And finally the obvious: wouldn't it be fairly simple to write a randomization shuffling program that would give the house a bigger edge -- https://chicago-lawyer.info/blackjack/blackjack-practice-site.html of stack the deck?
I know that one software company randomly picks two cards in the deck and reverses them, and repeats this numerous times.
Since learning of this technique, that is also how I shuffle in my random simulation programs.
As long as any method of shuffling is done enough times the deck should be properly randomized.
Manual shuffling is more vulnerable to a biased shuffle and consequently some players try to exploit this by shuffle tracking and card clumping.
There are numerous ways an online casino might cheat, but a bad shuffle I don't think is one of them.
I was wondering if you thought continuous shufflers have an effect on basic strategy?
I know they speed up the number of hands per hour which is usually bad for the player, but is basic strategy still effective in this instance?
Doesn't basic strategy slightly change depending on the number of decks?
I first addressed this topic in my December 1, 2000, newsletter.
For those who missed it I just added to my blackjack card holder, which explains the effect on the house edge under both a cut card and continuous shuffler game.
To answer your question, no, the basic strategy does not change.
Basic strategy is always developed based on a freshly shuffled shoe, which is always the case when playing against a continuous shuffler.
There are a few cards left in the shoe part of the machine anywhere from 1 to 20 or so that are not shuffled.
Is there any way this can be used to advantage?
For example, I was thinking that there is a lower but still not zero probability of having a card repeated two hands in a row.
Sit out if there were a lot of high cards last hand.
Maybe enough to skew the odds?
As a card counter it would probably be safe to use a true count from just the last hand played and off the top of a shoe.
On a CSM blackjack game, 5 deck, what would be the effect of the dealer not putting discards back into the machine every hand if 24 of 52 cards in the discard rack were face cards?
What about 48 of 102?
What would be the effect if 44 of 52 cards were non-face cards?
Can the odds be heavily skewed?
However your speculation is right that the odds favor the dealer if he leaves a lot of high cards in the discard rack blackjack card holder will put back into play a lot of small cards.
This would be the same kind of thing as preferential shuffling, in which the dealer of a hand held game shuffles when the count is good but deals another round on a bad blackjack no gambling />Preferential shuffling is something that definitely does happen here in Las Vegas so what you describe would not surprise me either.
I was just wondering if Las Vegas Video Blackjack reshuffles after every hand or after all the decks are played.
I blackjack 55 upgrades proboat the tables in Las Vegas do it after all the decks are played because if they did it after every hand no one would play.
Is this even legal or necessary?
First, thank you for the great site.
I went to Las Vegas for this first time this past summer and I played double-deck at the Orleans.
I noticed that after a dealer shuffled both decks, the dealer asked the player to cut the deck.
I did not mind, so I cut the deck.
Is there a blackjack cut blackjack card holder that I am not aware of, or is there a better reason why?
However if everyone initially declines somebody has to rise to the occasion and do it.
Of course this is nonsense.
Playing blackjack on a continuous shuffling 5-deck system, are the odds of winning different than playing the dealer with 1 deck or 2 decks?
For blackjack card holder beneit of other readers, my explains, the house edge in a five-deck game is 0.
The difference between five decks and two decks, all other rules being equal, is 0.
So the two-deck game without a shuffler would be much better.
As my show difference in house edge between four decks and five decks is 0.
So the benefit of a continuous shuffler is worth less than removing a single deck.
While playing blackjack at a locals casino in Las Vegas, a dealer from another locals casino sat at my table.
While making small talk, she told me that she could wipe out any player using what she called the "house shuffle.
Have you ever heard of anything called the house shuffle?
Dealers are not the most skeptical group, often believing all the usual gambling myths.
Usually the term "house shuffle" refers to the way the dealers are supposed to shuffle.
For example, shuffle twice, riffle, and shuffle again.
I absolutely love your site.
I enjoy the strategies and probability discussions as much as, or more than, the actual gambling!
I was playing six-deck Blackjack in a St.
After playing a shoe, the cards were returned to the auto shuffler, which indicated a card was missing.
The dealer proceeded to deal the next shoe while the floor person inspected the returned blackjack card holder of cards.
Upon completion of this shoe, the missing card from the previous shoe a king was found in the un-dealt portion of the second shoe.
Assuming this King tucson specials pizza blackjack the bottom card and was left in the shuffler, it would have been in play in this first shoe the cut was in rear portion of the deck.
How much of an additional advantage did the house gain on me with this mistake?
Thank you for the kind words.
According to table D17 in by Don Schlesinger, removing one ten per deck increases the house edge by 0.
Dividing that by six, for the six-deck game, the effect is an increase in house edge of 0.
I believe it does because the deeper you get into the shoe, the blackjack card holder the absolute value of the count will tend to get, which should trigger count-based strategy changes.
In a non-cut-card game, blackjack card holder house advantage is always the same for the non-counter.
Clumps of high or low cards are just as likely to appear at the beginning of the shoe, as the middle, as the end.
You seem to be suggesting that the cards are more clumpy at the end of the deck.
However, if that were true, then the odds would change if the dealer dealt the cards in reverse order.
Surely that is a ridiculous notion.
If the count were high, just click for source would be the right play, resulting in what would look like an error to a counter who was watching.
However, if the count were negative then hitting would be all the better.
In the end, it averages out, for the basic strategy player.
For reasons I explain in my blackjack card holder, the basic strategy player should prefer a game with a continuous shuffler, if his goal is to minimize the house edge.
Aside from that, the house edge is not affected by penetration.
I should add that with a shallower penetration there will be more time spent shuffling, and thus a lower expected loss on an hourly basis.
Sign Up For Updates You're Subscribed!
Enter your email address below to subscribe to our weekly newsletter along with other special announcements from The Wizard of Odds!
Card counting at 6 deck 21 with John Stathis
Shop a wide selection of Trademark Poker Blackjack Dealing Shoe- 4 Deck at. A professional grade discard tray and finger slot for quick card pick-up allows ...
Improbably. It seems impossible.
Has come on a forum and has seen this theme. Allow to help you?
I think, that you are not right. I can prove it. Write to me in PM, we will talk.
It � is healthy!
I know, to you here will help to find the correct decision.
I apologise, but, in my opinion, you are not right. I can prove it. Write to me in PM, we will talk.
It is remarkable, rather amusing idea
I think, that you are mistaken. Write to me in PM.
I am sorry, that has interfered... This situation is familiar To me. Write here or in PM.
It is a pity, that now I can not express - it is compelled to leave. But I will return - I will necessarily write that I think on this question.
The word of honour.
It will be last drop.
It is remarkable, the valuable information
I thank for the information, now I will not commit such error.
Interesting theme, I will take part. Together we can come to a right answer.
In my opinion you are not right. I am assured. Let's discuss.
It is unexpectedness!
It is remarkable, this very valuable opinion
On your place I would ask the help for users of this forum.
Completely I share your opinion. It is excellent idea. I support you.
I consider, that you are not right. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will talk.
The duly answer