Online BLACKJACK VIP Dealer ?100 MINIMUM BETS PART 2 Real Money Play at Mr Green Online Casino
Online blackjack to practice card counting - Gambling - Questions and Answers - Page 1 - Forums - Wizard of Vegas Using the Online blackjack practice with "warn on strategy errors enabled".
Wanted to ask the wizard on this because I'm still new to card counting.
Assuming it might be an issue with the rules of the game.
Anyways, according to the "illustrious 18" on your site, if you have a hard 16 against a 10 and the count is +0 or higher it says you should stand.
I currently have a 10,6 vs a dealer 10.
True count is +1 +4 with 4.
Hand analyzer shows Stand being at -0.
However, I just want to make sure I'm using the counting system correctly.
Rules are as follows: 8 decks, 75% penetration.
Peeks for BJ pays 3:2 on BJ can split up to 3 times, aces only once with one card.
Double on any 2 cards, including after splits No surrender allowed Using the standard Hi-lo count Edit: Same rules as above, ran into this scenario: 6,10 vs a 10.
Running count is -10, 3.
A,2,9 against dealer read article />Running count is -6, 4 decks left for a true count of -1 rule states hard 12 against blackjack practice site 2, hit as long as true count is less than 3 Hand analyzer shows: -0.
I could understand the first example above as it's a very borderline case, but this one doesn't seem to make sense at all as it should heavily favor hitting.
My only guess is it's taking into account every card that's actually left and not going by the hi-lo count recommendations.
Welcome to the forum.
I am pretty sure the practice BJ game here uses Basic Strategy and does not factor in the count.
My response will bump up this thread so maybe someone who knows for sure will respond.
What is the URL of the trainer you are using?
You seem to indicate one from https://chicago-lawyer.info/blackjack/blackjack-oynama-stratejileri.html Wizard of Odds site, but please specify.
This trainer at this Wizard of Odds address should give you what you want: The page is listed as last updated today, so if that is what you are using it might have changed what is recommended.
I infer that data you present is taken from blackjack practice site display, in which case the contradictions you cite rightfully raise questions.
I think your intuition that the hand analysis percentages are derived from the remaining cards in the shoe is probably correct.
All card counting systems are imperfect.
If you take the time to search for it, you can find studies that compare how well each system measures up to perfection.
In general, the closer to perfection a system rates, the more difficult it is to use.
You are probably seeing a hand analysis based on one possibility.
The Hi-Lo system aim is to make a decision that is right for the majority of those possibilities.
I infer that data you present is taken from the display, in which case the contradictions you cite rightfully raise questions.
I think your intuition that the hand analysis percentages are derived from the remaining cards in the shoe is probably correct.
All card counting systems are imperfect.
If you take the time to search for it, you can find studies that compare how well each system measures up to perfection.
In general, the closer to perfection a system rates, the more difficult it is to use.
Completely agree with you there, however when trying to practice based solely off the hi-lo system and not the computer generated correct playit's a bit frustrating lol.
I'm enjoying using the tool with a hidden count, occasionally revealing it to make sure I'm at the correct count and also using the warnings to tell me I wasn't using the correct index number.
It's frustrating when I get a blackjack practice site even though I am actually following the correct table.
Is there a tool that warns of incorrect play based soley off the tables?
Is there a tool that warns of incorrect play based soley off the tables?
Counting systems are imperfect, but they offer a way to approach blackjack practice site play given our human limitations.
If your aim is perfect play, I suggest you bone up on programming and start pricing out single board systems you can conceal and interact with at the table.
Online sites will probably spot your perfect play in short order.
These days, it is advisable to label your humor as such.
Also, the penalty for being caught using machine aided play is quite a bit stiffer than being caught card counting.
Counting systems are imperfect, but they offer a way to approach perfect play given our human limitations.
If your aim is perfect play, I suggest you bone up on programming and start pricing out single board link you can conceal and interact with at the table.
Online sites will probably spot your perfect blackjack practice site in short order.
These days, it is https://chicago-lawyer.info/blackjack/pocket-blackjack-21.html to label your humor as such.
Also, the penalty for being caught using machine aided play is quite a bit stiffer than being caught card counting.
He meant he wants the warnings to go off when they are wrong based on the Hi-Lo tables instead of perfect play.
Blackjack Genius [Part 1] - Learning Basic Strategy (S17 Tables)
While mastering the game takes a bit of practice, the rules of blackjack are basic and easy to understand, giving many players a good chance at winning.
I join. So happens. We can communicate on this theme.
It is good idea.
YES, it is exact